Customer discovery

Find the first painful workflow.

The goal is not to ask whether people like the idea. The goal is to discover where breeding teams currently suffer: cross planning, diversity preservation, genomic prediction workflow, or CRISPR/edit prioritization.

Target list

SegmentWho to findWhy
Plant breedersCrop geneticists, quantitative genetics labsCore user for cross decisions and long-term selection strategy.
Breeding data scientistsPeople building genomic selection workflowsLikely first champions; they already feel the gap between data and decisions.
Precision breeding / CRISPRPlant gene-editing teamsValidate edit prioritization and edit-to-breeding strategy.
Agtech / seed startupsFounders, R&D leadsFaster feedback than large incumbents.
Microbial strain engineeringDirected evolution / fermentation teamsPossible second beachhead with short generation cycles.

Interview questions

  • How do you currently decide which crosses to make?
  • Do you simulate selection strategies across future generations?
  • How do you manage inbreeding and diversity loss?
  • Which tools do you use for genomic selection today?
  • What part of the workflow breaks most often?
  • What data do you usually have: genotype, phenotype, pedigree, environment?
  • Who owns the final breeding decision?
  • Would comparing aggressive vs diversity-preserving strategies be useful?
  • For CRISPR-enabled breeding: how do you choose edit targets and genetic backgrounds?
  • What demo would make this immediately credible?

Email template

LinkedIn template